• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

namisgr

Member
  • Posts

    54,937
  • Joined

Posts posted by namisgr

  1. On 2/20/2024 at 11:43 AM, revat said:

    I’m sure some of it if not most is insurance and liability, but there are probably other aspects that can only be explained by decision makers within the company.

    I don't think it's a stretch to consider that the more value slabbing and grading adds to the selling price of a comic, the more CGC can charge for the slabbing and grading service.  The marketplace has established that the value of their service is much, much greater for the submitter of an Amazing Fantasy #15 (tens of thousands of dollars)  than it is for the submitter of an Amazing Spiderman #126 (tens of dollars).

    LowGradeBronze and NickFurious have made this point already, and I agree with it.  In comparison, I suspect that their higher insurance burden for more valuable books is just a relatively small contributor to deriving their tiered fees.

  2. On 2/21/2024 at 1:59 PM, shadroch said:

    IF CGC's President has no responsibility for this mess, why should the CEO?

    I know you're being facetious, Bill, but Mr. Eichenbaum wrote:

    We will not tolerate acts of fraud against our community, and we will not rest until justice is served.

    But it hinders rather than promotes the serving of justice to keep the collector and dealer community underinformed about the submission histories of the outsider swapping fraudster and the insider couple printing their own labels and also swapping and stealing.

  3. Has there been release of anything conclusive that the in-house fraud was committed on no more than a maximum of 23 encapsulated books?  Has there been release of the total number of comics the fraudster couple had encapsulated since they began employment?

    In other words, are we certain of the scope of the fraud, or is the potential for more slabs being involved being swept under the rug, so to speak?

  4. Missing from the CEO letter regarding the two recent scams involving CGC is the commitment to help the comic collecting/dealing community identify additional possible instances of fraudulent grading.  Specifically, the letter made no mention and the company has made no public effort to provide to the community a complete listing of the certification numbers of every encapsulated book submitted by the swap-out external fraudster or submitted by the in-house fraudster using their access to the facility to make their own bogus labels.

    CGC can do better for us.

  5. On 2/15/2024 at 6:52 PM, AwesomeSauce said:

    Having a longstanding disagreement with a comic collecting comrade of mine. Figured if I got on here I could settle the score once and for all. Can anyone tell me if books from the Oregon Coast Collection are considered pedigrees?

    The Oregon Coast collection does not have a pedigree designation from CGC.  But being a sweet, sought after original owner collection of high grade white paged bronze age comics, I believe the provenance does have significance.

  6. CGC must release at a minimum the identities and certification numbers of the seven comics that were stolen and then encapsulated with stolen labels sporting much higher grades than the stolen books deserved, and then sold at auction.  They should also ask owners of these slabs to send them back to CGC in exchange for full value of the books as per their fraudulent grade, plus shipping cost and a reward for the sender.