Hey, I've been hyping Power-man 24 as an "undiscovered gem" for a while now.
And WTF is all this "Origin of XXX" BS? It's the first appearance of Black Goliath, no question, yet CGC seems to want to give "Origin" to any older books with pre-existing hero (or even normal) characters.
With Modern ones, it's always "First Appearance of XXX" (to let comic shops/member firms hype the readily-available books) like the idiotic "First Appearance of Winter Soldier" (ummmm, Bucky's been around for decades).
Winter soldier is the same as bucky in the exact same way Him is the same as warlock.
FF #66 then is the first appearance of warlock.
huh?
He's trying to say they are completely different characters. Like the 1st appearance of Carol Danvers isn't the same as the 1st appearance of Ms. Marvel. Like the 1st appearance of Jim Rhodes isn't the same as the 1st appearance of War Machine. Like the 1st appearance of Hank Pym isn't the 1st appearance of Ant-Man ;^)
Uh....but Bucky *is* the "Winter Soldier". Ditto to every other respective example you gave. An already existing character donning a "new" or another secret identity, does not make that a "new character". Or maybe I'm just the crazy one here.
-J.