Yorick

You guys should all band together and do a time-share or partnership contract and complete the book.

BLANK? I'd be worried its a photocopy. There are certainly a lot of St John printing errors though. I just handed 14 Bakers to CGC this weekend at the SF ComicCon. A True Love Pictorial 9 in the bunch has such a bad right edge mis-cut....

You might get $200 for that Batman alone. You would need better photos to gauge condition of course. Batman books are pretty hot right now.

Bronze age only? Sometimes an upgrade doesn't look like an upgrade. I suppose the comparable in coins is giving up a clean looking coin for a higher technical grade having a perfectly centered, high relief coin, but with some ugly thumb print on one side (maybe that's not possible - I'm not a collector of certified coins). For me, I need both in-hand to decide which to let go. Its a personal preference thing. Sometimes I'll wait until I have at least three to decide even to let one go.

I guess I can add a little something...

Holy $#&%!!!! Not my favorite of that run, but I know how difficult that issue is. I don't think my under-copy of #15 would fit your collection. Not a high enough grade.

What the heck happened to these books? They're no longer in my watch list. Anyone know what they ended at?

Wow. That really did break the previous high-grade... White pages?! Sheesh.

At least there's AC at the Moscone Center!

So happy to have a show back in the bay-area. However, SF goes and screws it up like always: the bay bridge will have partial closures and Bart is going to shut down a full section line in the Oakland area.

Hmmm..... I've got some sweet Mucha pages.

Those are both great pages for display. Also like that Batman just killed that guy.

I wish CGC would encapsulate a page like this!

Guess what arrived today?! Well, don't guess. Just look below...

Do either feature Superman or Batman (or Joker or Catwoman)? Do you want to work on getting more pages? Do you want to display them?

No no no. It says "Song of Death" "see back cover"....

I love me some Cinderella Love! I am eager to share my recent submission... any day now.

Yes, a recent submission (about February of this year). It must be something new. However, I always understood a qualified label to mean they look past that obvious huge flaw and grade the book as if it wasn't there. Mine is definitely a blue label 0.5, but qualified 0.5? I think I'm echoing everyone elses sentiments here...

Here's my qualified 0.5:

Hmmm... I wonder if that's the copy that I now own.

These arrived today!

I may have already said this, but too many copies of this one have mis-aligned red print. In this case, her lips detract from this cover's appeal for me.

@n2wdw Here's a digital collage of the US vs UK "Manhunt" vol. 1 no. 1. No censorship as there is with issue 4. I'll work on the other issues soon.

The UK edition cropped heavily into the illustration of that particular issue (maybe censorship since the dancing girl is half naked). They are also strictly black and white (no color halftones). I'll need to post a few photos!

What the heck?! I do a "Matt Baker" ebay search every day and didn't see that one!