• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Ed Hanes

Member
  • Posts

    577
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ed Hanes

  1. so the 'crunch' they seem to refer to...it looks more like the comic was bent at the corner , about one inch down and one inch over, making a diagonal...could probably be pressed. The bend is not that apparent in the interior pages but is easily seen in the front and back cover. And I dont see any effect on the spine. I couldn't see it until I removed the slab
  2. maybe it was pressed by previous owner ...but I dont remember any 'crunch' upon receiving the raw..I did not use any pressing service
  3. Useful information, thanks Perhaps I will just unslab it
  4. You can try selling lots on MCS (for comics that cant be sold separately) at auction only...but you will not make your money back..but you will get something back. Ebay is fickle when it comes to non key raws...key raws do well on Ebay..but non key raws dont seem to do as well as their slabbed counterparts (from my experience)..and I think this has to do with the international market.
  5. A couple years ago I sent in about 250 books I thought could be a 9.8 (prescreen)..about 80 came back as 9.8. With the fees associated with slabbing/ prescreen and selling..I broke even. It was fun but I did not make any money. I basically got my money back on 80 comics. I also tried just sending in about 100 comics that I thought would be in the 9's ...I got back 100 comics in a wide range of grades from 5's to 9.4's..mostly in the 7 to 8.5 ranges...I lost a lot of money on that. I thought I was fairly decent in grading but there's a reason why professional graders get paid..they have a lot of experience. So unless you are a master at grading and are very familiar with how CGC grades...most likely you will not do well, financially speaking. But, it is a fun process and you will learn a lot
  6. I don't know..I have always been under the impression that a crunch in a book (of any type) is a default that appears as 'folded in' as if it's been impacted ..maybe a crunch is something different to CGC. I am not seeing anything but a loosened splinter at the top of the spine ..are they calling that a crunch now...maybe a 'crunch' is something that can only be seen with CGC's supposedly new high powered microscopes they use for detecting insect damage...maybe they got an electron microscope and can see at the nanometer level anyway , I cant see any CRUNCH
  7. I didnt check when I got it..I put my trust in them It was also number 52..no mention of cover oxidation when I bought it and number 123 loose at staple ..which I dont remember seeing but that can be very subjective If I do buy from them again I will make sure to check everything
  8. The difference here being... the grades that I offered were on the same books/same grades that MCS sold me just a couple months before. Any comics I send to them that I bought elsewhere I just trust their grading as I don't know otherwise. The main problem here is not the downgrading, it's the oversight of faults that they should have seen before they sold the first time around..fairly major faults that I have become accustomed to seeing them.. document before I buy. For example, I would not have bought issue 60 knowing it had a detached centerfold.
  9. Of course Ebay would say it doesn't violate their policy...they make money off fraudulent items as well as contraband, so why would they care,,they are incredibly corrupt
  10. Yeah, I am going to end up doing that myself..I usually never send in silver/bronze raws to MCS ..had a weak moment
  11. I understand the variance in giving specific grades WRT different people but to miss a detached centerfold , cover oxidation, and loose cover seems odd..especially since these are commonly listed faults on MCS grading (implies that the graders are especially trained in spotting these faults)...plus from what I have been told by MCS, they are supposed to be rechecked before final listing
  12. I have been buying/selling from MCS for five years now and for the most part have been very happy but something just happened that is making me question using them again I bought all of these in the past year from MCS. When I get them I open them up to check their condition and then put back in the bag and place them in my boxes. Last week I sent these back to sell (I bought all of these MCS). When I bought these from MCS, none of them had the faults that are stated now (and MCS did not state these faults) and my grading was based on their previous grading I asked MCS to return them UGH, first CGC let me down .. now, MCS
  13. oh I see..my bad...GPA comics has one sale of it for 200 in Jan, 2023
  14. last sale on GPA comics was 45. You cant necessarily project FMV from sales years ago. This is the 'trendline' for sales of this issue..the rise in 2021 was due to the pandemic , in which most collectibles rose in price due to overinflated demand. But like most comics the bubble burst as the pandemic ended. If you go to gocollect, you can see an auction for 100 in sept 2023 and then an auction for 45 in dec 2023 (not a good sign) If you follow a statiscal trendline from 2021 and on (a downward sloping line) ..you probably have your asking price between 50 and 75 ...but you can ask anything you want and go into negotation..just dont be surprised if someone wont pay more than 50 for it.
  15. well, at least it will be streaming soon...I will wait till it's free on some platform though
  16. Yep...out of fear of being redundant...I will not say .."of course, employee theft ..imagine that"
  17. In the past week I decided to unslab over 20 of my books ..my silver age ASM as well as some signed copies of moderns. I dont know what to say..I have become tired of looking at the plastic holders...but ones that I dont feel comfortable unslabbing I sent off to be sold...these are mostly 9.8's that are signed. I unslabbed a few signed SS CGC because they were lesser grades. On one of them was ASM 55 (Pat Gleason cover white drawing over black background). It got a 9.4 because CGC said it had a water stain on the cover...there is no water stain..it's just how the white ink is juxtaposed over the black ink appearing like raised surfaces (similar to what water can do to paper)..especially dead center (I have other copies that have the exact same effect).... Just one more insult added to injury. I used to really believe in this company ( at one time I had hundreds of slabs)..oh, well, I will live