scburdet

>9.2

4.0

5.0

start at 9.2

7.0

6.0 with some room to improve

9.2/9.4

9.4

5.5

4.0. This one should say something on the indicia about it being a reprint or something. The blank UPC is a Whitman indicator

6ish now with room to improve

7.0, could reach 7.5 with work

8.0, I think it takes luck to go higher but stranger things happen.

9.4/9.6

9.0

>9.2

looks like there are some scuffs or something higher on the back cover near the kid's hand. I'd max around 9.0 unless there's some other explanation

9ish. Hard to say with that ding on the back. Could get graded more harshly, could be ok. With the high cost of FM's signing fee, plus shipping etc. I might shop around for s surer thing. Is a signing "worth it" is much more of a question of what you want in a collection than value added. My philosophy is not to end up with something valued lower than the signature fee. Around 8 is the break even grade for this assuming you paid cover

Using the edit feature to talk smack about technology 7.0 is a safe bet with pressing. 7.5 wouldn't shock me. I got a 7.5 from mine & I expected lower. My tipping point were the stress lines, yours looks like creasing, which CGC is harder on

Outside shot at 9.0 if cleaned & pressed well

8.0/8.5 as-is. I detect some discoloration along the top of the back cover. If that's a light stain, it would cap this below NM

Looks like a 7.5. I can see this getting a 7.0 though b/c of all the copies they grade

4.0/4.5. I think the lower those are some pretty significant creases on the back

That hard crease on the back dips to to 7.0 as a start. I'd say 2 grades lower for the overall additional conditions issues.

Looks like it would be a 7.0/7.5, but that divot on the back is going to knock it down a couple of grades