PGM Fantastic Four 5

[29dukedog]

Please take a look and let me know what you think. I'm having a hard time being objective with this copy. I've seen slabbed 2.0's that I didn't think looked as solid as this copy. Can I reason, then, that it's better than 2.0?

 

Complete and unrestored, tight cover and centerfold, almost flat white pages, and only minimal discoloration of the inside covers.

 

 

 

[SteveC77]

Please take a look and let me know what you think. I'm having a hard time being objective with this copy. I've seen slabbed 2.0's that I didn't think looked as solid as this copy. Can I reason, then, that it's better than 2.0?

 

Complete and unrestored, tight cover and centerfold, almost flat white pages, and only minimal discoloration of the inside covers.

 

I do.. I think you can reason that it's better than a 2.0. I have 2.5's that aren't as clean as this FF5. IMO it's a solid 2.5 possibly a 3.0. Keep us updated if you submit to CGC. Best of luck.

[bronze johnny]

Agreed- 2.5 - 3.0

[jimjum12]

Solid 3.0..... I've seen 3.5's that didn't have the eye appeal of this. GOD BLESS...

 

-jimbo(a friend of jesus) (thumbs u

[Hulksdaddy1]

3.5 Beautiful book!

[Primetime]

2.5/3.0

[jsilverjanet]

3.0/3.5

[Jester Hats]

SWEET looking book! I say 3.5 maybe even 4.0. There's no major creases or tears are there?

[29dukedog]

SWEET looking book! I say 3.5 maybe even 4.0. There's no major creases or tears are there?

 

No major defects of any kind, just general wear. What the scan doesn't show is just what you'd expect to find, judging from the wear it does show.

[Jester Hats]

SWEET looking book! I say 3.5 maybe even 4.0. There's no major creases or tears are there?

 

No major defects of any kind, just general wear. What the scan doesn't show is just what you'd expect to find, judging from the wear it does show.

K, 3.5 seems close to me.

[timfinz]

3.0 IMHO!

[crassus]

Please take a look and let me know what you think. I'm having a hard time being objective with this copy. I've seen slabbed 2.0's that I didn't think looked as solid as this copy. Can I reason, then, that it's better than 2.0?

 

Complete and unrestored, tight cover and centerfold, almost flat white pages, and only minimal discoloration of the inside covers.

 

 

 

In the upper right "Meet...Doctor Doom" there appears in the scan to be a vertical band of darker colour, is that the result of the scanner?

 

 

[29dukedog]

That's just an effect from my scanner.

 

Thanks to everyone who posted!

[makeminemego]

Looks like a 3.0. Wouldn't be shocked if it's a 3.5 in hand. Presents well.

[djpinkpanther67]

VG all day long

[Captain_Pike]

3.5

[marvelcollector]

3.0

[southerncross]

3.5 (thumbs u

[comicjack]

Classic FF 3.5 for me