Post Your Dumb Comic Book Covers 0

[Off Panel]

6 hours ago, ADAMANTIUM said:

You'll rue the day! then falls a 1,000 feet straight down  

 

Stilt-man’s signature move.

[catman76]

[kav]

7 hours ago, Off Panel said:

7 hours ago, ADAMANTIUM said:

Yes Yes  

What he did? He used the traction on his very capable Kanagroo shoes, and once he landed on the bar tower, he curled his toes around the bars with traction for leverage to angle right/up/tospideys/andsudoplex!!!

Expand  

Your no-prize is on its way, sir.

Bonus points for not mentioning unstable molecules or Pym particles. 

Nope.  Thats not the way vectors work-if he used traction as you suggest it would be a narrow arc-almost a straight line- not the wide arc depicted.  No no prize.

[vaultkeeper]

[ADAMANTIUM]

12 minutes ago, kav said:

Nope.  Thats not the way vectors work-if he used traction as you suggest it would be a narrow arc-almost a straight line- not the wide arc depicted.  No no prize.

You forget the toes curling around the top of the bar to change trajectory

It's all there @kav in my original statement

13 minutes ago, kav said:

Yes Yes  

What he did? He used the traction on his very capable Kanagroo shoes, and once he landed on the bar tower, he curled his toes around the bars with traction for leverage to angle right/up/tospideys/andsudoplex!!!

Expand  

 

[ADAMANTIUM]

And seeing how the traction is impossible 

And we dont know what super kangaroo traction super boots looks like

 

[ADAMANTIUM]

[lostboys]

[kav]

6 minutes ago, ADAMANTIUM said:

You forget the toes curling around the top of the bar to change trajectory

It's all there @kav in my original statement

19 minutes ago, kav said:

I forget nothing.  We studied vectors in physics.  I got an A.  If he projected himself upward, it would have to be a straight line opposing gravity.  If he arced backwards as depicted, there would have to be a third force to vector him back towards the tower.  Rocket jets or something.  He had none.

[kav]

8 minutes ago, ADAMANTIUM said:

You forget the toes curling around the top of the bar to change trajectory

 

This is a sentence, however it is an incorrect sentence.  It happens.

[ADAMANTIUM]

1 minute ago, kav said:

I forget nothing.  We studied vectors in physics.  I got an A.  If he projected himself upward, it would have to be a straight line opposing gravity.  If he arced backwards as depicted, there would have to be a third force to vector him back towards the tower.  Rocket jets or something.  He had none.

Except it was a playful joke, that we both got, hence the reply that at least I didnt try to defend with metaphysics 

Just now, kav said:

This is a sentence, however it is an incorrect sentence.  It happens.

Oh, ok thank you

[kav]

1 minute ago, ADAMANTIUM said:

Except it was a playful joke, that we both got, hence the reply that at least I didnt try to defend with metaphysics 

physics is not metaphysics.

[ADAMANTIUM]

7 hours ago, Off Panel said:

Your no-prize is on its way, sir.

Bonus points for not mentioning unstable molecules or Pym particles. 

Actually @kav this is what he said he actually didnt mention physics at all

[kav]

1 minute ago, ADAMANTIUM said:

Actually @kav this is what he said he actually didnt mention physics at all

I mentioned physics-me.

[ADAMANTIUM]

3 minutes ago, kav said:

physics is not metaphysics.

I didnt say you were wrong kav, we were having a playful discussion,  the traction is mythical we wouldnt know how it works hence the no prize

I dont understand how it turned serious for you....

[kav]

Just surrender and i'll move on to the next victim.

[ADAMANTIUM]

Just now, kav said:

I mentioned physics-me.

I was saying off panel mentioned metaphysics, you haven't followed the train of thought nor the conversation, nor understood the playfulness with which the no prize was awarded

 

I tried to explain it to you

But in this case you think it's all about you sorry friend your right I'm wrong 

[kav]

Just now, ADAMANTIUM said:

I was saying off panel mentioned metaphysics, you haven't followed the train of thought nor the conversation, nor understood the playfulness with which the no prize was awarded

 

I tried to explain it to you

But in this case you think it's all about you sorry friend your right I'm wrong 

well maybe it was traction-you never know.

[kav]

the one that gets me is in the spider man movies where he stand on the sidewalk and shoots a web up and for some reason the web then propels him up to the building somehow.  WTF

[ADAMANTIUM]

1 minute ago, kav said:

well maybe it was traction-you never know.

No that's the thing it's impossible for traction or curling to work

The point is I tried that was the reason for the no prize

Hence why I thought he mentioned at least I didn't "try" with particles....

It's not that I had succeddedi in bending the laws of gravity

Now that would be a trick.