• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

New Mutants 98 CGC 10.0

1,026 posts in this topic

sure would like to know the criteria for assigning a 9.9 versus a 10.0. Determining the difference between those 2 grades must require microscopes or molecular level data.

:)

 

Grats

 

A 9.8 could have a minor flaw or two - VERY minor.

 

A 9.9 can have one minor flaw - again, VERY minor.

 

A 10.0 can have no flaws whatsoever.

 

And I imagine there are magnifying glasses used at the CGC grading tables... along with black-lights and other things we aren't privy to.

 

:shrug:

 

 

-slym

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sure would like to know the criteria for assigning a 9.9 versus a 10.0. Determining the difference between those 2 grades must require microscopes or molecular level data.

:)

 

Grats

 

A 9.8 could have a minor flaw or two - VERY minor.

 

A 9.9 can have one minor flaw - again, VERY minor.

 

A 10.0 can have no flaws whatsoever.

 

And I imagine there are magnifying glasses used at the CGC grading tables... along with black-lights and other things we aren't privy to.

 

:shrug:

 

 

-slym

 

And a 9.8 could come back as a 10 with a resub, and a 10 can come back as a 9.8 on a resub. You never know how they'll grade from day to day. :insane:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sure would like to know the criteria for assigning a 9.9 versus a 10.0. Determining the difference between those 2 grades must require microscopes or molecular level data.

:)

 

Grats

 

A 9.8 could have a minor flaw or two - VERY minor.

 

 

 

-slym

We ARE talking about CGC, right?

What 9.8's have you been looking at?

I've seen 9.8's that could have easily been 9.0's! :facepalm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sure would like to know the criteria for assigning a 9.9 versus a 10.0. Determining the difference between those 2 grades must require microscopes or molecular level data.

:)

 

Grats

 

A 9.8 could have a minor flaw or two - VERY minor.

We ARE talking about CGC, right?

What 9.8's have you been looking at?

I've seen 9.8's that could have easily been 9.0's! :facepalm:

 

I was using a well-known definition of those grades. Whether or not CGC actually goes by them is another story.

 

 

 

-slym

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sure would like to know the criteria for assigning a 9.9 versus a 10.0. Determining the difference between those 2 grades must require microscopes or molecular level data.

:)

 

Grats

 

A 9.8 could have a minor flaw or two - VERY minor.

We ARE talking about CGC, right?

What 9.8's have you been looking at?

I've seen 9.8's that could have easily been 9.0's! :facepalm:

 

I was using a well-known definition of those grades. Whether or not CGC actually goes by them is another story.

 

 

 

-slym

 

All you have to do is look at CGC's grading for the last 11+ years to see that they don't consistently go by their own standards lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sure would like to know the criteria for assigning a 9.9 versus a 10.0. Determining the difference between those 2 grades must require microscopes or molecular level data.

:)

 

Grats

 

A 9.8 could have a minor flaw or two - VERY minor.

We ARE talking about CGC, right?

What 9.8's have you been looking at?

I've seen 9.8's that could have easily been 9.0's! :facepalm:

 

I was using a well-known definition of those grades. Whether or not CGC actually goes by them is another story.

 

All you have to do is look at CGC's grading for the last 11+ years to see that they don't consistently go by their own standards lol

 

They have standards?

 

:devil:

 

 

 

-slym

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

A 9.8 could have a minor flaw or two - VERY minor.

 

A 9.9 can have one minor flaw - again, VERY minor.

 

A 10.0 can have no flaws whatsoever.

 

And I imagine there are magnifying glasses used at the CGC grading tables... along with black-lights and other things we aren't privy to.

 

:shrug:

 

 

-slym

 

Do you know the standards? Or just prtend too?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites