D84 Posted July 5, 2022 Share Posted July 5, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forbush-Man Posted July 5, 2022 Share Posted July 5, 2022 On 7/5/2022 at 9:44 AM, D84 said: On 7/5/2022 at 8:04 AM, Forbush-Man said: I've never seen Tiptoes, so I had no idea. You need to see it. There aren't words to describe the movie. Life is too short, ain't nobody got time for dat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D84 Posted July 5, 2022 Share Posted July 5, 2022 On 7/5/2022 at 12:37 PM, Forbush-Man said: Life is too short, ain't nobody got time for dat! Life is too short, get every laugh you can. There is scene where they discuss Mathew McCaughey in a circle with a bunch of little people. It is comedy gold. Forbush-Man 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forbush-Man Posted July 5, 2022 Share Posted July 5, 2022 On 7/5/2022 at 10:55 AM, D84 said: Life is too short, get every laugh you can. There is scene where they discuss Mathew McCaughey in a circle with a bunch of little people. It is comedy gold. I'll do it if someone gives me the time-stamp. I can just jump to it and watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sauce Dog Posted July 5, 2022 Share Posted July 5, 2022 On 7/5/2022 at 12:44 PM, D84 said: You need to see it. There aren't words to describe the movie. That is not true, all the words are very short & small though ;) D84 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco685 Posted July 12, 2022 Author Share Posted July 12, 2022 Sauce Dog 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straw-Man Posted July 12, 2022 Share Posted July 12, 2022 he is terrific in the "you" series. i'd like that casting very much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco685 Posted July 12, 2022 Author Share Posted July 12, 2022 On 7/12/2022 at 2:20 PM, Straw-Man said: he is terrific in the "you" series. i'd like that casting very much. Oh really? I am not familiar with this actor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco685 Posted July 16, 2022 Author Share Posted July 16, 2022 Beige, Forbush-Man and MGsimba77 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimik Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 (edited) Makes sense from a business perspective. India has a younger population and is likely to pass China in total population soon. Edited July 17, 2022 by kimik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TupennyConan Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 On 7/16/2022 at 1:40 PM, Bosco685 said: I don't know anything about them other than what I just read on WIKI. If I had to throw a dart at the notion, it would be that they're both pushing 50. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco685 Posted July 17, 2022 Author Share Posted July 17, 2022 On 7/17/2022 at 6:11 AM, TupennyConan said: I don't know anything about them other than what I just read on WIKI. If I had to throw a dart at the notion, it would be that they're both pushing 50. So Disney is going for the geriatric Indian market (67 million males and 71 million females in 2021 )? Those narrow-minded marketeers. Larryw7 and TupennyConan 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xenosmilus Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 India doesn’t pay full price for Disney+ from my understanding. Larger population or not it’s probably not a as large a money maker as you would think. It might make their stock go up however. I can’t believe they would do that however. That would be an epic mistake even for they way things have been going for Phase 4. MGsimba77 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callaway29 Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 On 7/16/2022 at 1:40 PM, Bosco685 said: It's 100% part of their formula now (active inclusiveness), but how/why would they trash Krasinski. From a speculation standpoint, what demographics are left? American Indian? Eskimo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sauce Dog Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 (edited) On 7/17/2022 at 9:35 AM, Callaway29 said: It's 100% part of their formula now (active inclusiveness), but how/why would they trash Krasinski. From a speculation standpoint, what demographics are left? American Indian? Eskimo? Considering neither of those demographics you mentioned are terms that have been used for decades now (even in schools), I would say it's a safe bet they won't be marketing to those by name specifically without massive problems Indigenous peoples covers both groups just fine, though it is also fine to get specific with Inuit/Yupik (I do get what you were saying and nobody is offended, no harm no fowl - I just found it amusing when in a post regarding inclusiveness so figured it best to post a clarifier for everyones benefit). One a side note: There is a massive push right now in tech and media for inclusiveness of Indigenous peoples, as they are a giant untapped market that requires very specific work to even reach in the first place (let alone to get it right). I can't go into too many details due to NDAs but the projects Facebook/Meta has in development are very impressive with the care they are putting in handling it (as all of it requires working directly with the tribes to translate complex tech terms & concepts correctly, often needing to formulate brand new language and syntax in order to even reach the people). Edited July 17, 2022 by Sauce Dog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callaway29 Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 On 7/17/2022 at 11:43 AM, Sauce Dog said: Considering neither of those demographics you mentioned are terms that have been used for decades now (even in schools), I would say it's a safe bet they won't be marketing to those by name specifically without massive problems Indigenous peoples covers both groups just fine, though it is also fine to get specific with Inuit/Yupik (I do get what you were saying and nobody is offended - but I found it amusing when in a post regarding inclusiveness). One a side note: There is a massive push right now in tech and media for inclusiveness of Indigenous peoples, as they are a giant untapped market that requires very specific work to even reach in the first place (let alone to get it right). I can't go into too many details due to NDAs but the projects Facebook/Meta has in development are very impressive with the care they are putting in handling it (as all of it requires working directly with the tribes to translate complex tech terms & concepts correctly, often needing to formulate brand new language and syntax in order to even reach the people). For real? If not offended, at a minimum triggered... Xenosmilus and Larryw7 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Straw-Man Posted July 17, 2022 Popular Post Share Posted July 17, 2022 (edited) On 7/17/2022 at 10:43 AM, Sauce Dog said: Considering neither of those demographics you mentioned are terms that have been used for decades now (even in schools), I would say it's a safe bet they won't be marketing to those by name specifically without massive problems Indigenous peoples covers both groups just fine, though it is also fine to get specific with Inuit/Yupik (I do get what you were saying and nobody is offended, no harm no fowl - I just found it amusing when in a post regarding inclusiveness so figured it best to post a clarifier for everyones benefit). One a side note: There is a massive push right now in tech and media for inclusiveness of Indigenous peoples, as they are a giant untapped market that requires very specific work to even reach in the first place (let alone to get it right). I can't go into too many details due to NDAs but the projects Facebook/Meta has in development are very impressive with the care they are putting in handling it (as all of it requires working directly with the tribes to translate complex tech terms & concepts correctly, often needing to formulate brand new language and syntax in order to even reach the people). all birds are offended by this. no benefit felt here.. Edited July 17, 2022 by Straw-Man alexgross.com, TupennyConan, Xenosmilus and 2 others 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xenosmilus Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 On 7/17/2022 at 11:43 AM, Sauce Dog said: Considering neither of those demographics you mentioned are terms that have been used for decades now (even in schools), I would say it's a safe bet they won't be marketing to those by name specifically without massive problems Indigenous peoples covers both groups just fine, though it is also fine to get specific with Inuit/Yupik (I do get what you were saying and nobody is offended, no harm no fowl - I just found it amusing when in a post regarding inclusiveness so figured it best to post a clarifier for everyones benefit). One a side note: There is a massive push right now in tech and media for inclusiveness of Indigenous peoples, as they are a giant untapped market that requires very specific work to even reach in the first place (let alone to get it right). I can't go into too many details due to NDAs but the projects Facebook/Meta has in development are very impressive with the care they are putting in handling it (as all of it requires working directly with the tribes to translate complex tech terms & concepts correctly, often needing to formulate brand new language and syntax in order to even reach the people). What about Eskimo brothers? D84 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsilverjanet Posted July 18, 2022 Share Posted July 18, 2022 Jason Segel as the thing https://comicbookmovie.com/tv/marvel/she-hulk/has-how-i-met-your-mother-star-jason-segel-been-cast-as-fantastic-fours-the-thing-in-upcoming-mcu-project-a194821#gs.64wy8c Larryw7 and Mystafo 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimik Posted July 18, 2022 Share Posted July 18, 2022 If it is Segel, then Marvel effed up again in casting an actor who is too tall just like Wolverine. According to the Marvel Comics Wiki, the Thing is only 6' tall. Segel is 6'4". How can they do this yet again? https://characterprofile.fandom.com/wiki/The_Thing_(Marvel_Comics) Cat, Larryw7, TupennyConan and 1 other 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
