rainmaker Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 may have to make a few moves to take a serious run at some of these low grade bat covers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sqeggs Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Looks like CC just added a second 29. A 3.0 this time. Nicer looking than the 3.5 imo. HA also added a 29 1.8 ® and a 32 6.5 Tec collectors will be having a field day ! Right after getting back from the bank to inquire into a personal loan! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotham Kid Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 another 31 for CC. 2.0 but brittle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woowoo Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Looks like CC just added a second 29. A 3.0 this time. Nicer looking than the 3.5 imo.HA also added a 29 1.8 ® and a 32 6.5 Tec collectors will be having a field day ! Not even close the 3.0 way way way better to have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotham Kid Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Looks like CC just added a second 29. A 3.0 this time. Nicer looking than the 3.5 imo.HA also added a 29 1.8 ® and a 32 6.5 Tec collectors will be having a field day ! Not even close the 3.0 way way way better to have. The 29 3.0 has been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Knight Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 See what you guys did that they had to remove the Tec 29 3.0 .. Urgh i shouldn't have read this thread because there's definitely a lot of books there on my wantlist but now is not a good time for me to be buying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotham Kid Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Having a 29 3.0 and a 29 3.5 in the same auction would not be a smart move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woowoo Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Looks like CC just added a second 29. A 3.0 this time. Nicer looking than the 3.5 imo.HA also added a 29 1.8 ® and a 32 6.5 Tec collectors will be having a field day ! Not even close the 3.0 way way way better to have. The 29 3.0 has been removed. Yup press and regrade 25k more in 2 weeks as a 5.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishbone Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 "another 31 for CC. 2.0 but brittle. " Any guesses as to how much a 31 2.0 brittle would go for these days ? Think it would go 30K ? more or less? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotham Kid Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 "another 31 for CC. 2.0 but brittle. " Any guesses as to how much a 31 2.0 brittle would go for these days ? Think it would go 30K ? more or less? Depends on eye appeal but I would still say over 30K. No scan yet. http://www.comicconnect.com/bookDetail.php?id=691089 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Action252Kid Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 5.5 Bat 1 just got added to Heritage too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lou_fine Posted September 17, 2016 Share Posted September 17, 2016 Looks like CC just added a second 29. A 3.0 this time. Nicer looking than the 3.5 imo.HA also added a 29 1.8 ® and a 32 6.5 Tec collectors will be having a field day ! Not even close the 3.0 way way way better to have. The 29 3.0 has been removed. Having a 29 3.0 and a 29 3.5 in the same auction would not be a smart move. An obvious posting blunder by CC with respect to these 2 copies of 'Tec 29. If I was the consignor of the 3.5 copy that is remaining in the auction, I would not be thrilled at all as this mistake is most likely going to cost the consignor a lot of money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lou_fine Posted September 17, 2016 Share Posted September 17, 2016 Looks like CC just added a second 29. A 3.0 this time. Nicer looking than the 3.5 imo.HA also added a 29 1.8 ® and a 32 6.5 Tec collectors will be having a field day ! Not even close the 3.0 way way way better to have. Any idea as to the time period when these 2 copies were graded? Just wondering if it is possible that the 3.5 copy was graded during one of CGC's loose grading periods while the 3.0 copy was graded during one of their tight grading periods? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.A.tor Posted September 17, 2016 Share Posted September 17, 2016 Looks like CC just added a second 29. A 3.0 this time. Nicer looking than the 3.5 imo.HA also added a 29 1.8 ® and a 32 6.5 Tec collectors will be having a field day ! Not even close the 3.0 way way way better to have. Any idea as to the time period when these 2 copies were graded? Just wondering if it is possible that the 3.5 copy was graded during one of CGC's loose grading periods while the 3.0 copy was graded during one of their tight grading periods? Tape on the 3.0? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lou_fine Posted September 17, 2016 Share Posted September 17, 2016 Looks like CC just added a second 29. A 3.0 this time. Nicer looking than the 3.5 imo.HA also added a 29 1.8 ® and a 32 6.5 Tec collectors will be having a field day ! Not even close the 3.0 way way way better to have. Any idea as to the time period when these 2 copies were graded? Just wondering if it is possible that the 3.5 copy was graded during one of CGC's loose grading periods while the 3.0 copy was graded during one of their tight grading periods? Tape on the 3.0? Not sure about the 3.0 copy since I can't find it on their site. The 'Tec 29 CGC 3.5 copy does have tape on the interior cover and centerfold, as clearly specified on both the CGC label and CC's auction listing description. Probably loosely graded as it looks like a pretty rough 3.5 graded book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotham Kid Posted September 17, 2016 Share Posted September 17, 2016 The 3.0 had note of tape on the interior and was graded 08/25/2016. I have a scan. Ninja skills too fast even for CC. Turns out most of the HA books are restored as they are updating the descriptions and adding scans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lou_fine Posted September 17, 2016 Share Posted September 17, 2016 The 3.0 had note of tape on the interior and was graded 08/25/2016. Any idea as to the date of grading for the 3.5 copy that is currently up for auction? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gotham Kid Posted September 17, 2016 Share Posted September 17, 2016 The 3.0 had note of tape on the interior and was graded 08/25/2016. Any idea as to the date of grading for the 3.5 copy that is currently up for auction? 07/13/2012 2012 was a loose grading year. This book is evident. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lou_fine Posted September 17, 2016 Share Posted September 17, 2016 The 3.0 had note of tape on the interior and was graded 08/25/2016. Any idea as to the date of grading for the 3.5 copy that is currently up for auction? 07/13/2012 2012 was a loose grading year. This book is evident. Another perfect example of buy the book as opposed to buy the label for those in the know. Any bets that the CGC 3.0 copy would have graded out as a CGC 4.0 or possibly even as a CGC 4.5 copy back in 2012? Unfortunately, a large percentage of the bidders on these auctions tend to go only with the label because they don't pay as much attention as us and as a result, really have nothing else to go on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Boy Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 How long after Tec 36 was Tec 38 and Bats 1 ?? How long before was Tec 27 ?? (yes I could google but whats the fun in asking someone who knows off the top of their head) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
