• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

current turn around rates at CGC
79 79

Started by MarkDAnderson,

26,969 posts in this topic

Old Fashion PB and J

Old Fashion PB and J

Posted
Posted

Current Submission:

MFT: 8/1/14 - Verified 8/5/14- 8/12/14 Graded- 8/14 Graded/Quality Control- 8/15 Shipped/Safe

 

MST: 8/1/14 Received

 

Magazine: 8/1/14 - Verified 8/5/14- Sch for grading 9/3- 9/15 Graded

 

EFT: 8/1/14 - Verified 8/5/14- sch. for grading 8/27 - graded 9/3 - 9/15 Graded/QC- 9/15 Shipped...

 

EFT: 8/5/14 Received- Verified 8/12/14- 8/28 Scheduled for grading- 9/15 Graded

 

MFT SS 8/5/14 Received - Graded 8/19/14 - Graded/QC Limbo 8/22/14- 8/27 shipped/safe

 

EFT SS 8/5/14 Received - 8/28 Scheduled for grading - Graded 9/3

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PIR8

PIR8

Posted
Posted (edited)

Previous Submissions

 

MST > Received: 5/15 > Verified: 6/10 > Scheduled for Grading: 6/18 > Graded: 7/02 > Grading/Quality Control: 7/15 > Shipped/Safe: 7/15 *

 

MST > Received: 6/02 > Verified: 7/01 > Scheduled for Grading: 7/10 > Graded: 7/16 > Graded/Quality Control: Skipped > Shipped/Safe: 7/28 *

 

MFT > Received: 6/02 > Verified: 6/10 > Scheduled for Grading: 6/16 > Graded: 6/23 > Graded/Quality Control: 6/26 > Shipped/Safe: 6/30 *

 

MST > Received: 6/26 > Verified: 8/05 > Scheduled for Grading: 8/08 > Graded: 8/08 > Grading/Quality Control: 8/13 > Shipped/Safe: 8/19 *

 

MFT > Received: 6/25 > Verified: 6/30 > Scheduled for Grading: 7/08 > Graded: 7/11 > Grading/Quality Control: 7/15 > Shipped/Safe: 7/17 *

 

MFT > Received: 7/14 > Verified: 7/15 > Scheduled for Grading: 7/21 > Graded: 7/23 > Graded/Quality Control: 7/30 > Shipped/Safe: 8/01 *

 

MFT > Received: 7/17 > Verified: 7/18 > Scheduled for Grading: 7/29 > Graded: 7/30 > Grading/Quality Control: 7/31 > Shipped/Safe: 8/4 *

 

Current Submissions

 

MST > Received: 6/25 > Verified: 7/30 > Scheduled for Grading: 8/25 > Graded: 8/26 > Grading/Quality Control: 9/8 >

 

MST > Received: 8/04 >

 

MST > Received: 8/05 >

 

MST > Received: 8/05 >

 

MST > Received: 8/06 >

 

MFT (Pre-Screen) > Received: 8/27 > Verified: 9/09 > Scheduled for Grading: 9/10 > Graded: 9/11 > Grading/Quality Control: 9/15 >

 

MFT > Received: 9/05 > Verified: 9/12 >

 

MFT > Received: 9/15 >

Edited by AntBrown
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gem_Mint

Gem_Mint

Posted
Posted

Modern Slow Track (15 books)

Received 8/04

 

Economy Magazine (3 books)

Received 8/04

Verified 8/06

Scheduled for Grading 9/03

Graded 9/12

 

Standard (1 book)

Received 8/22

Verified 8/25

Scheduled for Grading 9/11

Graded 9/16

 

Economy Fast Track (8 books)

Received 9/08

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PIR8

PIR8

Posted
Posted

Previous Submissions

 

MST > Received: 5/15 > Verified: 6/10 > Scheduled for Grading: 6/18 > Graded: 7/02 > Grading/Quality Control: 7/15 > Shipped/Safe: 7/15 *

 

MST > Received: 6/02 > Verified: 7/01 > Scheduled for Grading: 7/10 > Graded: 7/16 > Graded/Quality Control: Skipped > Shipped/Safe: 7/28 *

 

MFT > Received: 6/02 > Verified: 6/10 > Scheduled for Grading: 6/16 > Graded: 6/23 > Graded/Quality Control: 6/26 > Shipped/Safe: 6/30 *

 

MST > Received: 6/26 > Verified: 8/05 > Scheduled for Grading: 8/08 > Graded: 8/08 > Grading/Quality Control: 8/13 > Shipped/Safe: 8/19 *

 

MFT > Received: 6/25 > Verified: 6/30 > Scheduled for Grading: 7/08 > Graded: 7/11 > Grading/Quality Control: 7/15 > Shipped/Safe: 7/17 *

 

MFT > Received: 7/14 > Verified: 7/15 > Scheduled for Grading: 7/21 > Graded: 7/23 > Graded/Quality Control: 7/30 > Shipped/Safe: 8/01 *

 

MFT > Received: 7/17 > Verified: 7/18 > Scheduled for Grading: 7/29 > Graded: 7/30 > Grading/Quality Control: 7/31 > Shipped/Safe: 8/4 *

 

Current Submissions

 

MST > Received: 6/25 > Verified: 7/30 > Scheduled for Grading: 8/25 > Graded: 8/26 > Grading/Quality Control: 9/8 >

 

MST > Received: 8/04 >

 

MST > Received: 8/05 >

 

MST > Received: 8/05 >

 

MST > Received: 8/06 >

 

MFT (Pre-Screen) > Received: 8/27 > Verified: 9/09 > Scheduled for Grading: 9/10 > Graded: 9/11 > Grading/Quality Control: 9/15 >

 

MFT > Received: 9/05 > Verified: 9/12 > Scheduled for Grading: 9/16

 

MFT > Received: 9/15 >

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mayor006

Mayor006

Posted
Posted
Modern normal: 08/01/2014 Received. That was 45 29 business days ago. If they grade them 10s I will forgive them. :)

 

Recalculated that for you. Onsite grading in Chicago and Baltimore slows things down a bit.

 

and that right there is why I have been averaging calendar days instead of relying on business days. I send at least one a month so almost two years data now to pull from to get average times for tiers gives me a pretty close estimate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mysterio

mysterio

Posted
Posted
Modern normal: 08/01/2014 Received. That was 45 29 business days ago. If they grade them 10s I will forgive them. :)

 

Recalculated that for you. Onsite grading in Chicago and Baltimore slows things down a bit.

 

and that right there is why I have been averaging calendar days instead of relying on business days. I send at least one a month so almost two years data now to pull from to get average times for tiers gives me a pretty close estimate.

 

I don't disagree with you, but in this case it seemed like the poster was getting antsy about a 45 day period when CGC was only seeing 29 days. Counting in calendar days is a good way to go, as long as one understands how CGC is counting them. At the end of the day they'll all go grossly over estimates as usual no matter how you count the days. (thumbs u

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Iceman399

Iceman399

Posted
Posted
Modern normal: 08/01/2014 Received. That was 45 29 business days ago. If they grade them 10s I will forgive them. :)

 

Recalculated that for you. Onsite grading in Chicago and Baltimore slows things down a bit.

 

and that right there is why I have been averaging calendar days instead of relying on business days. I send at least one a month so almost two years data now to pull from to get average times for tiers gives me a pretty close estimate.

 

I don't disagree with you, but in this case it seemed like the poster was getting antsy about a 45 day period when CGC was only seeing 29 days. Counting in calendar days is a good way to go, as long as one understands how CGC is counting them. At the end of the day they'll all go grossly over estimates as usual no matter how you count the days. (thumbs u

 

You mean 81 calender days is a good deal for moderns that still haven't shipped? :baiting:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mysterio

mysterio

Posted
Posted
Modern normal: 08/01/2014 Received. That was 45 29 business days ago. If they grade them 10s I will forgive them. :)

 

Recalculated that for you. Onsite grading in Chicago and Baltimore slows things down a bit.

 

and that right there is why I have been averaging calendar days instead of relying on business days. I send at least one a month so almost two years data now to pull from to get average times for tiers gives me a pretty close estimate.

 

I don't disagree with you, but in this case it seemed like the poster was getting antsy about a 45 day period when CGC was only seeing 29 days. Counting in calendar days is a good way to go, as long as one understands how CGC is counting them. At the end of the day they'll all go grossly over estimates as usual no matter how you count the days. (thumbs u

 

You mean 81 calender days is a good deal for moderns that still haven't shipped? :baiting:

 

Not sure I ever claimed that. But that would fit my statement that submissions will go grossly over estimates no matter how you count the days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jsilverjanet

jsilverjanet

Posted
Posted (edited)

update

 

MFT #1 - rec ? > ver 2/18 > sch 2/27 > grd 2/28 > grd/QC 3/12 > shipped 3/13

MFT #2 - rec 2/24 > ver 2/26 > sch 3/5 > grd 3/10 > grd/QC 3/18 > shipped 3/20

Modern - rec 2/24 > ver 2/26>sch3/19>grd 4/1>grd/qc 4/16>shipped 4/17

MFT #3 - rec 4/3>ver 4/9>sch 4/16>grd 4/18>grd/QC 4/24>shipped 4/25

Value FT #1 - rec 4/7>verified 4/16>sch 5/7>grd 5/12> grd/qc 5/17>shipped 5/19

Coupon - rec 5/19 > ver 5/20>sch 6/2>grd 6/3 >grd/QC 6/5>shipped

MFT#3 - rec 6/16>ver?>sch 6/30>graded 7/1>grd/qc 7/3>shipped 7/10

MAGEXP#1 - rec 7/3>ver 7/7>sch 7/7>grd 7/9>grd/qc 7/17>shipped 7/17

MFT#4 - rec 7/3>ver 7/8>sch 7/16>graded 7/17>grd/qc 7/21>shipped 7/22

Express - rec 7/7>ver 7/7>scheduled 7/7>grd 7/9>grd/qc 7/11>shipped 7/14

 

EFT#1 - rec 6/16>ver 6/17>sch 7/16>graded 7/21>grd/qc 7/29>???>shipped? can't remember

 

New

 

submission

 

 

ModernSlow - rec 7/7>ver 8/15>sch 8/25>grd 8/27>grd/qc 9/10

MFT#5 - rec 9/8>ver 9/11> scheduled for grading 9/16>graded 9/16 :o

Edited by jsilverjanet
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Iceman399

Iceman399

Posted
Posted
Modern normal: 08/01/2014 Received. That was 45 29 business days ago. If they grade them 10s I will forgive them. :)

 

Recalculated that for you. Onsite grading in Chicago and Baltimore slows things down a bit.

 

and that right there is why I have been averaging calendar days instead of relying on business days. I send at least one a month so almost two years data now to pull from to get average times for tiers gives me a pretty close estimate.

 

I don't disagree with you, but in this case it seemed like the poster was getting antsy about a 45 day period when CGC was only seeing 29 days. Counting in calendar days is a good way to go, as long as one understands how CGC is counting them. At the end of the day they'll all go grossly over estimates as usual no matter how you count the days. (thumbs u

 

You mean 81 calender days is a good deal for moderns that still haven't shipped? :baiting:

 

Not sure I ever claimed that. But that would fit my statement that submissions will go grossly over estimates no matter how you count the days.

 

Wasn't trying to insinuate you claimed that. I don't go by their estimates at all and one reason like this thread to get a "feel" for how long it should take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PIR8

PIR8

Posted
Posted

Previous Submissions

 

MST > Received: 5/15 > Verified: 6/10 > Scheduled for Grading: 6/18 > Graded: 7/02 > Grading/Quality Control: 7/15 > Shipped/Safe: 7/15 *

 

MST > Received: 6/02 > Verified: 7/01 > Scheduled for Grading: 7/10 > Graded: 7/16 > Graded/Quality Control: Skipped > Shipped/Safe: 7/28 *

 

MFT > Received: 6/02 > Verified: 6/10 > Scheduled for Grading: 6/16 > Graded: 6/23 > Graded/Quality Control: 6/26 > Shipped/Safe: 6/30 *

 

MST > Received: 6/26 > Verified: 8/05 > Scheduled for Grading: 8/08 > Graded: 8/08 > Grading/Quality Control: 8/13 > Shipped/Safe: 8/19 *

 

MFT > Received: 6/25 > Verified: 6/30 > Scheduled for Grading: 7/08 > Graded: 7/11 > Grading/Quality Control: 7/15 > Shipped/Safe: 7/17 *

 

MFT > Received: 7/14 > Verified: 7/15 > Scheduled for Grading: 7/21 > Graded: 7/23 > Graded/Quality Control: 7/30 > Shipped/Safe: 8/01 *

 

MFT > Received: 7/17 > Verified: 7/18 > Scheduled for Grading: 7/29 > Graded: 7/30 > Grading/Quality Control: 7/31 > Shipped/Safe: 8/4 *

 

Current Submissions

 

MST > Received: 6/25 > Verified: 7/30 > Scheduled for Grading: 8/25 > Graded: 8/26 > Grading/Quality Control: 9/8 >

 

MST > Received: 8/04 >

 

MST > Received: 8/05 >

 

MST > Received: 8/05 >

 

MST > Received: 8/06 >

 

MFT (Pre-Screen) > Received: 8/27 > Verified: 9/09 > Scheduled for Grading: 9/10 > Graded: 9/11 > Grading/Quality Control: 9/15 >

 

MFT > Received: 9/05 > Verified: 9/12 > Scheduled for Grading: 9/16 > Graded: 9/16

 

MFT > Received: 9/15 >

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mysterio

mysterio

Posted
Posted
Modern normal: 08/01/2014 Received. That was 45 29 business days ago. If they grade them 10s I will forgive them. :)

 

Recalculated that for you. Onsite grading in Chicago and Baltimore slows things down a bit.

 

and that right there is why I have been averaging calendar days instead of relying on business days. I send at least one a month so almost two years data now to pull from to get average times for tiers gives me a pretty close estimate.

 

I don't disagree with you, but in this case it seemed like the poster was getting antsy about a 45 day period when CGC was only seeing 29 days. Counting in calendar days is a good way to go, as long as one understands how CGC is counting them. At the end of the day they'll all go grossly over estimates as usual no matter how you count the days. (thumbs u

 

You me an 81 calender days is a good deal for moderns that still haven't shipped? :baiting:

 

Not sure I ever claimed that. But that would fit my statement that submissions will go grossly over estimates no matter how you count the days.

 

Wasn't trying to insinuate you claimed that. I don't go by their estimates at all and one reason like this thread to get a "feel" for how long it should take.

 

Yep, that is the value of this thread. That's why I always contribute my data whenever I do occasionally send in a submission. My coupon books should arrive there this week, so it will be time to start a new update and begin my :taptaptap: followed by a :facepalm: and hopefully after I get the grades a :whee:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PIR8

PIR8

Posted
Posted
The longest a modern has ever taken me in that two year period was 92 calendar days.

 

I'm not too far off from that with my MST from June right now. Though there was a problem with the invoice that caused delay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
79 79
Go to topic listing