Buzzetta Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Are they still threatening to release this movie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco685 Posted July 12, 2015 Author Share Posted July 12, 2015 Because you all clamored for this to the highest rafters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Hog Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 So, nice thing about this is that no one is really a fan of the content... You know, unless you go to blockbuster... Yeah... Jamie loves his mustachette. I can wait for this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComicConnoisseur Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Mark Millar (Chrononauts) and Bryan Hitch (Justice League of America) had one hell of a run on Fantastic Four a few years back, and now the latter has brought his cinematic style of artwork to Josh Trank's upcoming reboot for a Comic-Con exclusive poster. Sue looks rather manish don't she? They made her look strong , while making Reed look like a little momma`s boy. I just noticed that. I think this might be a case of the PC forces behind the scenes having it`s hand in changing the Jack Kirby and Stan Lee version. Well, at least the Thing is still the Thing! 1950's war comics 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marvelcollector Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Mark Millar (Chrononauts) and Bryan Hitch (Justice League of America) had one hell of a run on Fantastic Four a few years back, and now the latter has brought his cinematic style of artwork to Josh Trank's upcoming reboot for a Comic-Con exclusive poster. Sue looks rather manish don't she? Yes, she does. And Reed rather boyish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comicopolis Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Mark Millar (Chrononauts) and Bryan Hitch (Justice League of America) had one hell of a run on Fantastic Four a few years back, and now the latter has brought his cinematic style of artwork to Josh Trank's upcoming reboot for a Comic-Con exclusive poster. Sue looks rather manish don't she? They made her look strong , while making Reed look like a little momma`s boy. I just noticed that. I think this might be a case of the PC forces behind the scenes having it`s hand in changing the Jack Kirby and Stan Lee version. Well, at least the Thing is still the Thing! Or it is just bad art. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paperheart Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Mark Millar (Chrononauts) and Bryan Hitch (Justice League of America) had one hell of a run on Fantastic Four a few years back, and now the latter has brought his cinematic style of artwork to Josh Trank's upcoming reboot for a Comic-Con exclusive poster. Sue looks rather manish don't she? They made her look strong , while making Reed look like a little momma`s boy. I just noticed that. I think this might be a case of the PC forces behind the scenes having it`s hand in changing the Jack Kirby and Stan Lee version. Well, at least the Thing is still the Thing! Or it is just bad art. put a monocle on the Thing and he's Mr. Peanut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisInBaltimore Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Mark Millar (Chrononauts) and Bryan Hitch (Justice League of America) had one hell of a run on Fantastic Four a few years back, and now the latter has brought his cinematic style of artwork to Josh Trank's upcoming reboot for a Comic-Con exclusive poster. Did they have a hell of a run? Wasn't it only 12 issues? It showed a lot of promise, but didn't go anywhere if memory serves me correctly. I remember it being sort of a let down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzzetta Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Is the Thing wearing pants? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLiamSturgess Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Highly doubtful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bronze_rules Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 (edited) Because you all clamored for this to the highest rafters... No one looks the least bit enthusiastic about the comic material or film. "I never read FF except to look at the encyclopedia...blockbuster video was more important." Instead of source material, he sent the reed actor "quantum physics for dummies," to get into character. Like that would even be necessary for a kids comic film. This has win written all over it. Edited July 13, 2015 by bronze_rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzzetta Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 I just got out of bed to something that sounded like a very loud vacuum. It was this loud sucking sound… Then I realized that it was the sound of someone, somewhere, watching the Fantastic Four trailer. (And this is coming from someone that believes that the naysayers need to take a 'wait and see' approach to Batman v Superman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco685 Posted July 13, 2015 Author Share Posted July 13, 2015 Well, this is a turn in the story. FANTASTIC FOUR: Toby Kebbell Reveals A Surprising Twist For 'Doom' So it seems Toby Kebbell was either winding people up last year with all that Victor Domashev stuff, or Fox got wind of the backlash and decided to make a few alterations. SuperHeroHype caught up with the British actor at SDCC and asked him about this take on the character, and based on what he says here, the villain's name is Victor von Doom and he's not a hacker (guess he was misinterpreted) but a computer technician. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzzetta Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Well, this is a turn in the story. FANTASTIC FOUR: Toby Kebbell Reveals A Surprising Twist For 'Doom' So it seems Toby Kebbell was either winding people up last year with all that Victor Domashev stuff, or Fox got wind of the backlash and decided to make a few alterations. SuperHeroHype caught up with the British actor at SDCC and asked him about this take on the character, and based on what he says here, the villain's name is Victor von Doom and he's not a hacker (guess he was misinterpreted) but a computer technician. It sounds like they have made several revisions once they started production in order to acquiesce to the public perception of the characters. The real problem may be that the original vision, combined with the revisions make for an even more disastrous movie. I really have no faith in this project. I always said I would reserve critique until I knew and saw more. I think I have seen enough. I will wait until this pops up on Netflix or TV. To tell the truth, I still have not seen Amazing Spider-man as word of mouth on that was so bad amongst those that I know who actually saw it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr 9.8 Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Is it true this was originally supposed to be chronicle 2, but fox changed it to the f4 too keep the property from going back to marvel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zosocane Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Go to 10:47 ... they just finished the post-production on the film, it appears. I'm guessing it's the soundtrack because Trank says they just finished "the mix stage." You would think that at least one of them would come out on stage wearing a hat or t-shirt with the classic "4" logo on it. But then I remind myself that we didn't see the "4" logo until FF #3. Despite all the understandable negativity on it (yes, the latest TV trailers, posters and promo art did not help), I still think this film has a lot of potential to be really good. We shall see ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince Namor Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Well, this is a turn in the story. FANTASTIC FOUR: Toby Kebbell Reveals A Surprising Twist For 'Doom' So it seems Toby Kebbell was either winding people up last year with all that Victor Domashev stuff, or Fox got wind of the backlash and decided to make a few alterations. SuperHeroHype caught up with the British actor at SDCC and asked him about this take on the character, and based on what he says here, the villain's name is Victor von Doom and he's not a hacker (guess he was misinterpreted) but a computer technician. Computer technician? Like a member of Best Buy's Geek Squad? Oh, yeah. That's better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chip Cataldo Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Turd. Turd turd. Turd turd turd. This movie is one big turd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsilverjanet Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Turd. Turd turd. Turd turd turd. This movie is one big turd. and yet we are both going to watch it greggy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEnglandGothic Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Turd. Turd turd. Turd turd turd. This movie is one big turd. and yet we are both going to watch it Eventually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
