• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Captain America Comics #1 Club
14 14

1,543 posts in this topic

 

:gossip: belongs to VintageComics. Was offered on the boards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

:gossip: belongs to VintageComics. Was offered on the boards.

 

Yup. I talked to Knightsofold but he's happy with his cover for now.

 

I am open (and motivated) to sell it if anyone is interested. (thumbs u

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone wants to get in the club, there is a nice looking 2.0 on C-Link. Looks undergraded in my opinion.
cover is split and detached...2.0 is as high as it goes...but it does "present" better...not 60K imo, but a pretty copy in the slab...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone wants to get in the club, there is a nice looking 2.0 on C-Link. Looks undergraded in my opinion.
cover is split and detached...2.0 is as high as it goes...but it does "present" better...not 60K imo, but a pretty copy in the slab...
just graded a few weeks ago so not a pre May 2013 submission
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone wants to get in the club, there is a nice looking 2.0 on C-Link. Looks undergraded in my opinion.
cover is split and detached...2.0 is as high as it goes...but it does "present" better...not 60K imo, but a pretty copy in the slab...
just graded a few weeks ago so not a pre May 2013 submission
exactly...2.0 is now as high as cgc goes , I believe, on tape reattached covers...days past, might have been a 4.0 (hence the asking price I'm sure)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone wants to get in the club, there is a nice looking 2.0 on C-Link. Looks undergraded in my opinion.
cover is split and detached...2.0 is as high as it goes...but it does "present" better...not 60K imo, but a pretty copy in the slab...

 

Didn't even see when it was graded. Makes sense on why it graded as a 2.0. A beauty none the less (thumbs u

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone wants to get in the club, there is a nice looking 2.0 on C-Link. Looks undergraded in my opinion.
cover is split and detached...2.0 is as high as it goes...but it does "present" better...not 60K imo, but a pretty copy in the slab...

 

Didn't even see when it was graded. Makes sense on why it graded as a 2.0. A beauty none the less (thumbs u

 

+1

 

:o A new to market freshly graded Cap 1. Don't see that everyday. That thing really is nice. The colours pop.

 

Has anyone pulled the grader's note and know for sure that the tape is actually reattaching the cover/centerfold? Would the label still not note such, even If CGC grades it as if the tape were not present? hm

 

-J.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone wants to get in the club, there is a nice looking 2.0 on C-Link. Looks undergraded in my opinion.
cover is split and detached...2.0 is as high as it goes...but it does "present" better...not 60K imo, but a pretty copy in the slab...

 

Didn't even see when it was graded. Makes sense on why it graded as a 2.0. A beauty none the less (thumbs u

 

+1

 

:o A new to market freshly graded Cap 1. Don't see that everyday. That thing really is nice. The colours pop.

 

Has anyone pulled the grader's note and know for sure that the tape is actually reattaching the cover/centerfold? Would the label still not note such, even If CGC grades it as if the tape were not present? hm

 

-J.

 

Interesting question. If that copy was originally graded a while ago before CGC changed its position on tape, somebody made a big mistake in having it regraded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
14 14