skypinkblu Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 I thought they were talking about "Him" at the end of one of the Guardians movies, maybe 1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco685 Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 27 minutes ago, skypinkblu said: I thought they were talking about "Him" at the end of one of the Guardians movies, maybe 1? Guardians 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsilverjanet Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 It was the second movie. And for Chip my comment was about the last avengers movie that she’s the one who gets him once hearing the distress signal greggy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cocomonkey Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 Or maybe she tries to get Warlock, but then he goes full-on Magus, and everyone plus Thanos teams up to stop him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chip Cataldo Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 39 minutes ago, jsilverjanet said: It was the second movie. And for Chip my comment was about the last avengers movie that she’s the one who gets him once hearing the distress signal Gotcha. That makes sense to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chip Cataldo Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 32 minutes ago, Cocomonkey said: Or maybe she tries to get Warlock, but then he goes full-on Magus, and everyone plus Thanos teams up to stop him... I think Magus would be a mistake. The GA would say, "So ANOTHER purple guy has the gauntlet now? *yawn*" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
234wallst Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 1 hour ago, Chip Cataldo said: If Captain Marvel's movie is set entirely in the 90s there's no way she can bring in Warlock before IW2. I don't see how he's in the next movie unless they introduce him in it. Russo's and Gunn already said Warlock won't be in Avengers 4. The reason was it would take too much time to develop his character during the movie. Obviously you can't just throw in the most powerful characters such as Danvers/Warlock without some back story. It only works for Danvers as she gets her own movie and can be retro fitted in the the MCU. Also the fact they've already teased Warlock would somewhat break the continuity. He's being created to take on the Guardians, and not to save the universe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
234wallst Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 11 hours ago, Chip Cataldo said: Power or Time, methinks. Well Time would (or should) undo the snap... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skypinkblu Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 12 minutes ago, 234wallst said: Russo's and Gunn already said Warlock won't be in Avengers 4. The reason was it would take too much time to develop his character during the movie. Obviously you can't just throw in the most powerful characters such as Danvers/Warlock without some back story. It only works for Danvers as she gets her own movie and can be retro fitted in the the MCU. Also the fact they've already teased Warlock would somewhat break the continuity. He's being created to take on the Guardians, and not to save the universe. They'd have to bring back the Guardians for him to take them on. Aren't Rocketand Nebula the only ones left? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chip Cataldo Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 14 minutes ago, skypinkblu said: They'd have to bring back the Guardians for him to take them on. Aren't Rocketand Nebula the only ones left? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco685 Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BorderlineHoarder Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 4 hours ago, Callaway29 said: Keeping the next movie’s title a secret is killing me... It better be "JK...LOL" I think I'm in the minority believing that this is not the end for Loki. That hand-to-hand assassination attempt against Thanos (with 2 infinity stones) felt so sloppy...was it Matt Damon in disguise? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantastic_four Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 1 minute ago, BorderlineHoarder said: I think I'm in the minority believing that this is not the end for Loki. I assume that whatever reset button gets hit un-does all the deaths, Loki and Heimdall's included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bird Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 6 minutes ago, fantastic_four said: I assume that whatever reset button gets hit un-does all the deaths, Loki and Heimdall's included. I wouldn't mind child Loki. I hope that a few things are different when all is "restored". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Carnage Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 (edited) 4 hours ago, 234wallst said: Russo's and Gunn already said Warlock won't be in Avengers 4. The reason was it would take too much time to develop his character during the movie. Agreed, this isn't a DC film Edited May 3, 2018 by Max Carnage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Sinescu Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 7 hours ago, jsilverjanet said: However the next movie revisits time. Maybe they do go back in time to the battle of NY maybe they go after Thanos at that time stopping him from every getting any of the stones they probably sacrifice themselves for the sake of the others Perhaps they'll go back far enough to reboot? MCU 2.0? Ultimate MCU? I mean, they're like 19 films in now, how do they expect new fans to jump on board after 11 years? MCU Reborn, maybe? MCU Now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cocomonkey Posted May 3, 2018 Share Posted May 3, 2018 4 hours ago, Chip Cataldo said: I think Magus would be a mistake. The GA would say, "So ANOTHER purple guy has the gauntlet now? *yawn*" Oh, I agree, Magus would be a mistake. But then again, I think audiences would accept another purple guy as long as he came with that glorious 'fro! They definitely left the door open for Loki to come back whether or not it's directly from undoing the end-of-movie deaths. They kept hedging his death--yeah, this time feels more permanent, but then again, he has done this before and come back from "dead"... This BuzzFeed interview with Markus and McFeely from yesterday made some interesting points, aside from them saying that "the deaths are real" and that Avengers 4 wasn't going to go the way fans expect (which, I assume, is an expectation that the heroes will undo all the deaths...). One of which was that when they wrote and filmed AIW, Black Panther hadn't opened yet. So they had no idea at the time that BP was going to be as big a success as it was, or that killing him off would be as shocking/effective as it would be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bosco685 Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kdoginohio Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 you know, we've got a whole year. i just think back to all of the things that folks got wrong with speculation on this film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sd2416 Posted May 4, 2018 Share Posted May 4, 2018 A friend is saying that when the city is attacked by Thanos Dark Order, that Strange starts the timelock and when Tony asks what is that, he says a little insurance. And that when he asked Thanos to spare Tony on Titan before giving him the stone, that he saw that Tony was integral to the 1:14,000,000 chance. I guess ill have to rewatch and see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
