• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Copper's Heating/Selling Well on Ebay
33 33

Started by fastballspecial,

18,816 posts in this topic

Jeffro.

Jeffro.

Posted
Posted

Ahead of DD for most unnecessary Marvel character:

Dr. Strange

Hawkeye

Luke Cage and Iron Fist

Black Panther

 

Or is your definition of major that they had their own title before 1965? Kind of smacks of what you collect sucks.

 

You really think so? I just never liked Daredevil. (shrug)

Always seemed like an odd choice to get his own book. Kind of a poor man's Spidey only far less interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites
porcupine48

porcupine48

Posted
Posted

Ahead of DD for most unnecessary Marvel character:

Dr. Strange

Hawkeye

Luke Cage and Iron Fist

Black Panther

 

Or is your definition of major that they had their own title before 1965? Kind of smacks of what you collect sucks.

 

You really think so? I just never liked Daredevil. (shrug)

Always seemed like an odd choice to get his own book. Kind of a poor man's Spidey only far less interesting

Did tou not know DD was a great fan of early RUSH?

True story....maybe lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lonzilla

Lonzilla

Posted
Posted

Ahead of DD for most unnecessary Marvel character:

Dr. Strange

Hawkeye

Luke Cage and Iron Fist

Black Panther

 

Or is your definition of major that they had their own title before 1965? Kind of smacks of what you collect sucks.

 

You really think so? I just never liked Daredevil. (shrug)

Always seemed like an odd choice to get his own book. Kind of a poor man's Spidey only far less interesting

Miller's DD run is the best of the late Marvel bronze age. Hands down

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jeffro.

Jeffro.

Posted
Posted

Ahead of DD for most unnecessary Marvel character:

Dr. Strange

Hawkeye

Luke Cage and Iron Fist

Black Panther

 

Or is your definition of major that they had their own title before 1965? Kind of smacks of what you collect sucks.

 

You really think so? I just never liked Daredevil. (shrug)

Always seemed like an odd choice to get his own book. Kind of a poor man's Spidey only far less interesting

Miller's DD run is the best of the late Marvel bronze age. Hands down

 

But it's all poop before that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cujobyte

cujobyte

Posted
Posted

Jeff's right, before Miller began writing DD, it was truly awful for a LOT of issues IMO. Then again Stan Lee is one of the worst writers in comics and he's a God lol. No offense for what he has created, but the actual writing is atrocious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kevin76

Kevin76

Posted
Posted
Jeff's right, before Miller began writing DD, it was truly awful for a LOT of issues IMO. Then again Stan Lee is one of the worst writers in comics and he's a God lol. No offense for what he has created, but the actual writing is atrocious.

 

He knows it was terrible but he was told he had to write stories so that children and adults with low IQs could understand and read them. They were never intended to be written they way they are now. If you worked in comics or read comics back when Stan Lee was writing, you were looked down upon by your peers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Logan510

Logan510

Posted
Posted
Jeff's right, before Miller began writing DD, it was truly awful for a LOT of issues IMO. Then again Stan Lee is one of the worst writers in comics and he's a God lol. No offense for what he has created, but the actual writing is atrocious.

 

 

Agreed and Citizen Kane is a piece of mess.

 

 

 

 

:insane:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
prez

prez

Posted
Posted
Jeff's right, before Miller began writing DD, it was truly awful for a LOT of issues IMO. Then again Stan Lee is one of the worst writers in comics and he's a God lol. No offense for what he has created, but the actual writing is atrocious.

 

That's a pretty ignorant take on Stan Lee's writing. Without Stan Lee spearheading the 60's, who knows what the comicbook landscape will looks like right now. He is definitely not Kirkman, Johns, nor Bendis but he sure did paved the way for today's greats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Crimebuster

Crimebuster

Posted
Posted
Jeff's right, before Miller began writing DD, it was truly awful for a LOT of issues IMO. Then again Stan Lee is one of the worst writers in comics and he's a God lol. No offense for what he has created, but the actual writing is atrocious.

 

That's a pretty ignorant take on Stan Lee's writing. Without Stan Lee spearheading the 60's, who knows what the comicbook landscape will looks like right now. He is definitely not Kirkman, Johns, nor Bendis but he sure did paved the way for today's greats.

 

 

I'd rather read Stan than any of those three, every day of the week. Especially Bendis. My god.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kevin76

Kevin76

Posted
Posted
Jeff's right, before Miller began writing DD, it was truly awful for a LOT of issues IMO. Then again Stan Lee is one of the worst writers in comics and he's a God lol. No offense for what he has created, but the actual writing is atrocious.

 

That's a pretty ignorant take on Stan Lee's writing. Without Stan Lee spearheading the 60's, who knows what the comicbook landscape will looks like right now. He is definitely not Kirkman, Johns, nor Bendis but he sure did paved the way for today's greats.

 

 

I'd rather read Stan than any of those three, every day of the week. Especially Bendis. My god.

 

Bendis's dialogue is really cheesy, Least Stan Lee's dialogue tried to make his dramatic

Link to comment
Share on other sites
valiantman

valiantman

Posted
Posted
Is the glossy version tougher to find?

Yes... but...

 

- the exact ratios have never been known.

- it's not clear if CGC gets the identification correct*.

 

* there are numerous cases where CGC has misidentified various Valiant gold variants which are clearly gold. It's hard to believe they would be good at identifying glossy vs. not-as-glossy but otherwise-identical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
33 33
Go to topic listing